The solution is not more technology, but more disciplined system design. Continuity must be thought of in the same way principals think about their companies, as an uptime guarantee. Estates should move away from asking “what if the internet goes down?” and instead ask “what’s our continuity percentage?” When framed as system performance, rather than emergency response, continuity becomes something measurable, improvable, and reassuring.
At its simplest, this means more than having a second line. It means designing connectivity with layers of resilience, automatic failover that switches invisibly, mobile backup to absorb the unexpected, and monitoring that tells staff about an issue before the principal ever notices. Just as importantly, these systems must be tested, rehearsed, and optimised, regularly, because resilience that isn’t proven is little more than KLM a theory.
The difference this makes is striking. That same residence, once plagued by failed calls, now operates without interruption. Board meetings run smoothly. Security remains consistent. Guests never ask for Wi-Fi codes twice. The principal doesn’t think about connectivity anymore, which is exactly the point. Continuity, once fragile, is now invisible.
Connectivity is no longer an add, on to estate life. It is an essential system, and like every system, its true measure is performance. Estates that optimise for uptime, rather than hoping for the best, not only avoid disruption but also deliver the quiet assurance principals expect. In the end, continuity isn’t about preventing outages; it’s about ensuring they no longer matter.